|
|
The ‘homunculus’ fallacy: when philosophy
comes real
Gábor Szirtes
http://people.inf.elte.hu/gszirtes
ELTE Faculty of Informatics
Dept of Information Systems
NIPG group
|
|
The problem of representation
The brain computes
Computing means encoding information through changes of state variables
Encoding is a transformation of the perception of the (partially) observed
environment into a ‘representation’
|
|
The Homunculus Fallacy
How do we
know that this is a phone?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Working Hypothesis
Fallacy can be resolved:
Let us turn the infinite regression into a loop:
The input (!) ‘makes sense’ if it can be reconstructed by
means of the representation
Auto-association (remember?)
|
|
 |
|
Biology or Engineering?
B: ‘Cause-oriented’
E: ‘Goal-oriented’
Link: Reverse engineering?
Strong AI: states that a computer with the right program would be mental.
The brain implements the software of human mind. It can be duplicated
(Mind body problem resolved…)
|
|
Turing Test
Operational definition?
All purpose Vacuum Cleaner (Gunderson,1964)
Anthropomorphism (Millar,1973)
Behaviorism (Block, 1981)
Chinese Room (Searle, 1980) |
|
Against Searle
Slow hardware (Dennett, 87)
Other minds
Other forms of intentionality (Carleton, 84)
System reply (Rorty, 84) But: observer-related intentionality
Wrong causal relation to the world (Fodor, 80)
|
|
(No) conclusion
Underlying properties of a (seemingly) cognitive
System
Goal-oriented
Interacting
Dynamic
Emerging complexity
What is missing?
|
|