| BIO szerver | BIO server | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kabai Péter | Peter Kabai | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter Kabai Evolution of brain and intelligence |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intelligence:
What is intelligence? Intelligence: general cognitive ability versus specific skills Measuring intelligence in humans Standard tests for "General Intelligence" (g-factor)
Verbal and non-verbal responses scored,might be quite
different |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
More than 2 types: "cognitive", "motoric", "emotional" etc. Emotional intelligence of dogs is comparable to humans... |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Human intelligence: what is special about it?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theory of mind: what is it? Theory of mind: I know what you know I can think with your mind I can act according to the information |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sabotage task:
Autistic children are as good as controls (normal and retarded). They all understood the task Deception task: Theory of mind or emotional intelligence? Many other tests with less emotional context (hidden objects) |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theory of mind: where is it Neuroimaging: Anterior cingulate cortex |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anterior cingulate cortex: ThoM + emotion, arousal Gallagher and Frith (2003)Trends in Cognitive Sciences |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theory of mind: How did it emerge ? Brain data on nonhuman animals not available Behaviour level Birds? Of course... |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theory of bird’s mind Scrub jays hide peanuts Theory of mind or programmed arousal? |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theory of mind: conclusions It might be more than a single skill:
Theory of mind: not unique to humans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Language. what is it? Human language: Information about Symbols: verbal, written, gesture signs etc. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Language: where is it? Critical areas:
Chimp homologs:
Not surprising... Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas: Asymmetrical in size and
activity in humans Surprising: similar asymmetry in chimps (in planum temporale) Chimps: |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Language. How did it emerge ? Language skill in animals? Great apes can learn to recognise symbols and use them adequately Koko: |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Language: grammar? Symbols are recognised, used and modified Connecting symbols: shaky ground Grammar? Conditioning? meaning (semantics) and structure (syntax) different skills Study in humans: Sentences different in semantics or in syntax |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Language. How did it emerge ? Gesturing in humans. When do you use gestures? Emotional message <-> talking to foreigners Do you gesture while not being seen? Study on congenitally blind children and adolescents |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gesturing in humans. Unlearned communication?
Experiment: Babies responded with „babbling” gestures Petitto et al. 2001. Nature. See homepage
of Laura-Ann Petitto Gesturing in humans. Evolution of real language? Children develope their own sign language |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gesturing. where is it? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gesturing and vocalization: are they coupled in monkeys?
Rhesus monkeys: facial expressions with distinct sounds Matching face expression and |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Language. Can birds speak? Yes, of course… African grey parrot Alex with Irene Pepperberg Words of objects, actions, number, shapes, colors etc. Concepts (same, different) Grammar? Visit The Alex Foundation www |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Language. How did it emerge ? Donnow.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gradual evolution?
Like learning foreign language: add 5 words/1000 years? Punctual evolution? Small changes followed by big leap (power low) Ferrer i Cancho & Solé (2003) PNAS
www |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cognition. what is it? Donnow. Learning about rules, changing rules Read the words then name the colours. Which task is more difficult? more on Stroop effect www
|
RED GREEN BLUE YELLOW |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Of course, birds know it all… |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cognition. where is it? Prefrontal cortex (birds do not have cortex ?) Damage of PFC: pour coffe, stir, add sugar Electrophysiology: single neurons respond to ** or **** in monkey PFC (Nieder et al. 2002. Science, free www) Hundreds of studies (human + non-human) Is human PFC bigger? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Textbook data:
humans have disproportionally bigger frontal cortex than apes Recent data: bigger, but not disproportionally |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anything human? Zoom in! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Structure of specific areas: area 10 of PFC |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cortical layers I-VI human, chimp, gibbon
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Genetic studies: Human-chimp comparison
Similarity Differences in sequence: Differences in expression: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Genetic studies: single genes
Only a few results: FOXP2 a gene for language? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FOXP2: regulatory gene
Effects expression of many genes |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FOXP2: regulatory gene
Human-chimp difference: 2 amino acid replacement Could be a major factor behind the emergence of speech? Probably not alone. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intelligence. Conclusions
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intelligence. Questions Small changes at gene and neural levels? Resulting small changes at behaviuoral level were adaptive Selective advantage: positive feedback? Leaps in performance of cognitive and language skills? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||