| Behaviour Server: http://www.behav.org | |||||
| Kabai Péter | |||||
| advice on essay | |||||
|
The effect of translocation and
temporary captivity on wildlife rehabilitation success: An experimental study
using European hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) Wildlife rehabilitation is a process in which a displaced,
sick, injured or orphaned wild animal regains the health and skills it needs to
live in the wild, and it is an international growing practice.
The recipient wild population may olso suffer as a
consequence of the increase in intra-specific competition and aggression and
increased trasmission or introduction of new diseases. Hedgehogs(Erinaceus
europaeus) are the most common species of mammal admitted to
wildlife hospitals in Britain. They are non-territorial, nocturnal and with a
flexible diet, so rehabilitated individuals are often released at novel
locations assuming that they are readily capable of adapting to their new
enviroment. They live in
hedgerows, grassland and gardens where they are very welcome, as their diet
consists mainly of pests that damage plants and vegetables. In fact they eat moth larvae and beetles which
are very high in nutrition. Later in the year they will olso start eating more
slugs, snails and other small moving prey because these are high in fat content
which the hedgehogs will need through their winter hibernation. Increased pubblic awareness has led to a greater number of
hedgehogs being taken to the RSPCA.
They are often found in an exposed position during daylight
hours, when they should remain hidden. They tend to be visible during the
daytime when they are unable to retreat to their nest due to illness or injury.
Hedghogs found during the day tend to
have a high gastrointestinal parasite load that leads to hyperactive behaviour.
Twenty suburban gardens were selected in Bristol UK
according to their location and disponibility of the property owners, as the
animals had to be provided with food for the first week. There were five treatment groups: 1. rehab-translocated
2. direct-translocated 3. captive
translocated (translocated after a period in captivity) 4. recipient
wild (free-living wild) 5. control
wild ( wild hedgehogs at a control site > Each hedgehog was fitted with a radio transmitter and their
spines were coloured to identify them individually. Every ten days each hedgehog was recaptured to be weight and examined for ticks, mites and signs of injury.
•Survival: recipient
wild had a significantly higher survival rate than individuals in the rehab-translocated,
direct-translocated and control wild. The survival probability of captive–translocated was significantly
greater than that for direct-translocated individuals. •Mass Loss: the direct
translocated had the greatest decline in body mass •Nocturnal ranging behaviour and patterns of habitat
utilization: recipient-wild and control wild hedgehogs had significantly
larger mean nightly ranges. The direct-translocated
group was significantly less active than the other groups overall during the
study. •Distance from release site to last known location:
the direct-tranlocated group
travelled the largest mean distance. •Nest sites: The mean number of days for which
individual nests were utilized wasn’t significantly different between the
groups. All individuals returned to a previously used nest site at least once.
The survival rate of the rehab-translocated sample wasn’t
less than the hedgehogs released in rural areas. Only the captive
translocated group had a survival rate comparable to the control wild. In fact there was a
significant difference between hedgehogs that had been kept for >1 month in
captivity compared to animals that had been directly translocated. The direct translocation seems to have a damaging effect on
survival, while a short period in captivity significantly increases the chance
of survival both for the rehabilitated after injury/sickness than for the
healthy ones. Probably the time spent in captivity enables individuals to
put on weight and become used to manipulation by humans. In fact both rehab-traslocated and captive-translocated hedgehogs gained
20% of their body mass during their captivity. It is olso important for hedgehogs to become accustomed to the frequent handling which is necessary during measurements, transport, transmitter attachment etc. These procedures can lead to a certain amount of stress, but a longer period in captivity can get animals used to it. There was no significant difference between the range size,
the distance travelled, the amount of time spent active between the groups, and
all returned at least once to a previously used nest site, so they all seemed
to have a similar ability to navigate successfully in the new enviroment. However all three tranlocated groups used a smaller night
range than the recipient wild and control wild groups, probably to reduce the
risk of urban hazards like roads, ponds, nets or uncovered drains. THE IMPACTS OF INTRODUCTIONS ON
THE RECIPIENT POPULATION There was no evidence of any immediate impact of the
introduction of traslocated individuals on the recipient population. The
recipient wild did not suffer a lower survival rate after the releases. There
was olso no increase in the nightly range size, distance travelled and
proportion of the night spent active, indicating there was no evidence for an
increase in competition for food or nests sites. Probably this is due to the
fact that suburban gardens have a high number of rich feeding sites. CONCLUSION Translocation is frequently used to return rehabilitated
animals to the wild. This study indicated that individuals held in captivity
prior to translocation, whether they were injured or not, had a better survival
rate than individuals translocated after a very short time spent in captivity. We have to remember though that long term captivity does
have a negative effect on survival. In fact individuals from populations that
have been in captivity for many generations are less likely to hide after
seeing a predator, decreasing their survival after reintroduction. On the other hand temporary captivity may be actually beneficial for wild-born translocation programmes and may be an alternative to other unsuccessful methods for reducing handling stress, such as tranquillisation. In addition, there was no immediate negative impact on the
recipient wild hedgehog population and there was olso no significant difference
between the survival rate of rehabilitated hedgehogs and the recipient wild ones. Sources http://csci.mrs.umn.edu/UMMCSciWiki/pub/Main/MElsbethMcPhee/BiologicalConservation2003.pdf http://www.hedgehogs.org.uk/facts/page4.html http://webserve.co.uk/bunnell/parasite.html http://www.uksafari.com/hedgehogs.htm http://webserve.co.uk/bunnell/disease.html Images http://hem.passagen.se/hedgehogs/hedgehogs.html
|
|||||
| Notes (if any) by Peter Kabai: | |||||
|
|||||