| Behaviour Server: http://www.behav.org | |||
| Kabai Péter | |||
| advice on essay | |||
|
Poaching of Israeli wildlife by Guest Workers Review
by Ron Carmit assignment
for the Wildlife Ecology course Introduction Wild animals,
including amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals are sold freely in food
markets throughout The causes of
wild species extinction in developing countries 1. Hunting and gathering, which still provide the essential protein sources for people in various developing countries, and is also integrated in their culture 2. Habitat destruction 3. Conservation is a luxury that can rarely be afforded in such countries Globalization has created the problem of large scale flow of people from poor, developing countries to richer, stronger economies. Opportunistic immigration in search for a better life through a better income is now the reality in most wealthy countries. It is accompanied by the transfer of cultural traditions, including attitudes to wildlife, hunting and gathering, as well as nutritional preferences and habits. Several
examples illustrating the above phenomena and its consequences Emigrants from Southeast Asia (over the past 20 years) have caused a negative impact on local fauna including fish, molluscs, birds, rodents and mammals by the use of nets to collect fish from lakes and rivers, as well as massive expulsion of game into hunting areas followed by the mainly unlicensed shooting of animals in excess numbers. Hmong immigrants
from Recent Asian immigrants were observed removing entire populations of limpets and barnacles from rocks. Illegal and excessive take of fish, shellfish and crustaceans by immigrants. Asian immigrants are not the only ones to import their hunting traditions to their new homelands, as described in the following examples: Italian and
Greek immigrants to Recent Russian and Korean immigrants were involved in illegal hunting of deer for meat and bear for medical purposes. The Israeli
situation Hunting in - Hunting is allowed only for animals that are classified as either agricultural pests or common. - Hunting requires an individual permit for the short annual hunting season. -
Hunting is not a common
practice in - The control of poaching in the country is made efficient by Nature Reserve Authority (NRA) rangers, who have contributed to an increase of wild animal populations between 1965 and 1990. Immigration
into the country -
In the early 90’s, the country
had started bringing agricultural workers from - There are small numbers of Chinese workers and other nationals employed in other fields, such as construction and home-nursing. These populations are generally not involved in hunting. - Thai workers are employed in most farms throughout the country. -
Together with the employment of
Thai workers in
Wild boar (Sus scrofa), Why do Thai
workers hunt? - Supplementary diet (mainly, but not only, by those of poor salary) - Varying their diet - As a hobby, leisure activity, out of boredom -
In Elementary
preventive steps Following the
discovery of poaching by Thai workers, each worker entering Hunting
Methods
The study
performed by Prof. Yom-Tov, with the aid of the Israeli NRA, is by far the most
extensive ever performed in A further search in and around homes of potential hunters to detect traps and hunting equipment was also performed. General statistics7 - 40 to 50 traps located per month - Over 300 traps located in December 2005 -
10% of Thai workers in Traps - 90 percent of the traps found were noose traps (snares). - The materials used to prepare traps reflect the materials available - iron, steel, copper wires, telephone cables and plastic twine. Ready traps and such in production process were also found in workers houses. - Traps were places in various locations: at the entrances to animal burrows as well as in paths below fences. They were usually anchored to a firm object - a tree, fence or pole. Animals were sometimes directed to a narrow opening in a fence and towards their trap. - Noose traps were mainly aimed at mammals, but some were planned to catch birds. Some traps were placed with the noose above water to catch ducks and waders. In several cases, makeshift water pools were made solely in order to attract small to medium sized birds. In the hot, dry climate of several parts of the country, this method easily attracts animals and birds. - Noose traps can also be hung from trees and were generally found to capture many species of animals. Any animal trying to pass through, or step on, such a trap is caught by the noose, which tightens around its neck, chest, abdomen or leg. The noose tightens while the animal struggles to escape, resulting in suffocation and/ or deep wounds. - Many traps were old and never checked. Some new traps were infrequently checked, leaving the animal to die. This may prove that poaching is possibly merely a recreational hobby. - Box traps were also common. Made as a metal frame from metal wire, with a door connected by wire or footboard to the bait (fruits, vegetables for herbivores or meat for carnivores) inside the trap. - Box traps are used to catch rodents, wild boars, nutrias, otters, etc. and varied in size accordingly. - Glue traps were also made in order to catch small rodents or hatching birds.
Noose traps hanging along a fence Antelope
( Porcupine
(Hystrix Kerr) left to die from wounds Active Hunting and Gathering -
Hand
held, Y shaped catapults are very common amongst Thai workers, who are highly
skillful in using them to shoot stones or small metal balls at birds and
reptiles. -
Driving
animals into a traps or net where they can be killed by spears is a common
practice for hunting hare or wild boars. -
Dug
pits covered by vegetation with embedded sharp objects, nets or noose traps
were used in the escape route of animals. Such traps are also dangerous to
humans. -
Smaller
slow moving animals such as hedgehogs and tortoises were gathered by groups of
workers simply walking in line in certain areas of the country. -
In
many cases smaller animals were cooked and eaten on the spot. -
Habitat
destruction also results from the active search for small animals. -
Nets
are usually used to capture aquatic or semi-aquatic animals and may be hand
made or bought, as seen in the pictures. -
Funnel
shaped nets were constructed within crops in order to lead a scared animal into
the closing net trap. Fine mist nets
were found hanging in order to catch birds.
Net trap in a pond
Moorhen (Gallinula chloropus) in the
trap
Rescuing the bird from the trap Animals at risk - The article specifies all animal species found in traps: - 28 species of mammals - foxes, boars, goats, hedgehogs, as well as a cow and a donkey, etc. Mostly caught by noose traps - 25 species of birds - storks, pigeons, doves, cranes, mallards, etc. Mostly caught by noose traps or hunt by catapults - 7 species of reptiles - turtles, lizards snakes, etc. - 3 species of amphibians - frogs, toads. - 5 species of Molluscs - 3 species of Crustaceans - Needless to mention that many of these species are either domesticated animals, species protected by animal conservation laws or extinct species. The scale of
the problem - The number of traps found is estimated to be lower than the real extent of hunting, due to technical limitations of finding traps within dense agricultural areas and nearby every fence and road around and within grazing areas and agricultural settlements in the country. - However, the evidence presented in the article show a significant problem for nature conservation. - Despite the extent of the problem, no study has been performed to quantify the effect of illegal poaching by Thai workers on a particular species. Law enforcement and prevention -
The
Israeli NRA cannot handle the workload, mainly due to manpower shortage, but
also because of the lack of proper, effective punishment following the capture
of offenders. -
Awareness
to the problem and the threats it poses, especially amongst officials, and the
concurrent punishment is only now being accelerated. -
This
acceleration came thanks to a letter written by academics from Israeli
universities to government officials, which was followed by media exposure and
the establishment of a coordination procedure between the NRA, the police and
the ministry of the interior. -
The
goal is to prosecute and expel workers caught laying traps or handling
protected animals. -
Improved
education is mentioned in the article’s conclusions as a possible solution for
the problem. I was surprise to discover that the NRA had organized (July 2003)
a special tour8 of the -
Wild animals’ consumption in -
A
survey by the China Wildlife Conservation Association5 and WildAid6
released in April 2006, suggests that Chinese are consuming less wild game. -
Half
of the people studied gave health risks as the reason for giving up animal
consumption. -
SARS
(Severe acute respiratory syndrome) and Avian Influenza are mentioned in many
sources over the web to be the reason why people have ceased consuming wild
animals, out of the understanding that this is the cause of the spread of these
diseases. -
Media
coverage of the SARS outbreak has increased Chinese public’s attention to the
possibility of disease transmission from wild animals to humans, especially
that of the H5N1 flu virus20. -
According
to the above survey, the total
consumption of wildlife had increased at the same time. The extent of wild animals’
sales in shops has also increased. -
The
SARS outbreak had also brought positive additions of specific clauses to the Chinese
health legislation, such prohibiting the consumption of wild animals and
advising a stricter management of pets. In the Chinese -
Civet (Viverricula indica) Wild animals’ consumption in
Thailand -
As
mentioned in Prof. Yom Tov’s article, enforcement of animal conservation laws
in 3rd world countries is a luxury. -
In Chiang Mai Night Safari7,
opened this year, the meat of exotic animals such as horse, kangaroo, giraffe,
snake, elephant, tiger and lion (some imported), as well as that of dogs and
crocodiles, is offered on zoo restaurants’ menus19. -
Traditional hunting of wild
cats for medicines had badly depleted their populations in My view of the problem Compared to other burning issues
in Israeli daily life, poaching of wild animals gets a certain, but still not
enough, attention in the media. When ‘googling’ the Hebrew results for “Thai, illegal
hunting” as opposed to “Kassam” (rockets occasionally launched from The original article was written 4
years ago, the data included in it was collected during July-September 2000 and
many of the references are from the end of the 90’s. I have learnt from recent Israeli
media reports that there is a significant increase in the efficiency of law
enforcement as well as public and official awareness to the problem; however, there
are only several cases of Thai workers expulsion from Israel reported, when an
average of 4-5 are expelled yearly. I came across one case of 4 Thai workers
whose work permits were revoked and were sentenced to expulsion after their
poaching activity was videotaped within the orchard of their employer. The
workers have petitioned13 to a higher court claiming not guilty
although a wild boar meat chunk was found in their home fridge. The petition
was rejected on May 2005. Nearly 20 years ago, there was a
very intensive campaign in the media (quite less developed than it is nowadays)
against the picking of protected flower species. The impact and success of this
campaign were so strong, that it is impossible to find an Israeli who cannot
remember which flowers are protected species as well as the slogans used to
bring awareness. Such intensity seems to be required in the case of wildlife conservation.
Failing to report the expulsion of workers or litigations in such cases, for
example, will not help deterring workers or native Israelis (also mentioned in
the article) from illegal hunting and does not enhance awareness amongst the Israeli
public. Several issues cannot be fully
covered here, such as the involvement of employers and native Israelis in such
illegal activity. The general issue of foreign work in Rumors in
I have tried to refer to the information
given without prejudice or passing judgment as Thais cannot be judged for a
tradition kept for centuries in their home country and many countries in its
region. I have found no sources on the
actual tradition of eating wild animals. It is impossible to think of odd
culinary habits in the
At first I thought the subject
would not be interesting enough to explore, but while writing these lines, I
came to know a significant problem in my home country as well many new wildlife
species and potential new travel destinations… Ron Carmit Sources 1.
Yom-Tov, Yoram (2003). Poaching
of Israeli wildlife by guest workers. Elseviers biological conservation 110,
11-20 2.
Professor Yoram Yom-Tov - webpage Websites 3.
Israeli Nature
and Parks Authority 4.
Bird research
center in Israel 5.
China
Wildlife Conservation Association 6.
WildAid Online Articles and Photo
sources 9.
The
guide said: Do Not Eat Foxes 10.
The
Thai Hunters 11. The Golan wolf - where to? 12. Sus Scrofa
(Tel Aviv University) 13. Thai students recruited as speakers against hunting
wild animals 14. Thai workers petitioning against their expulsion from
Israel 15.
China, Thailand, Myanmar - Eating animals to
extinction 16.
Chinese
eating less wild animals 17. More Chinese avoid eating wild animals 18. China bans eating wild animals 19. Rare animals on the menu at zoo 20.
Wild cat populations badly depleted 21. Cat
bird flu risks 'overlooked' 22. China
Tropical Lands Research 23. Amended
regulation on eating wild animals put to the question 24.
Eating bugs |
|||
| Notes (if any) by Peter Kabai: | |||
|
|||