| Behaviour Server: http://www.behav.org | |||||||||||
| Kabai Péter | |||||||||||
| advice on essay | |||||||||||
|
Conservation and game management of capercaillie
The wood grouse or capercaillie is the biggest of the game birds in Norway, when excluding the different goose species. It is regarded, as one of the most challenging hunting objects the Norway has to offer. It is seen as an indicator species in that is has quite strict demands on the biotope.
This species needs a wide range of biotope types in is habitat to survive.
The males and females have different demands and the young all have specific
requirement to the habitat, and if only one of this is damaged or disturbed
in some way it will probably show in the population of the wood grouse.
I will focus on a part of a population in a specific are in Norway that
I know well myself, and I have a reasonable recollection of the resent
interferences in the area.
General facts about the species: The wood grouse, Tetrao urogallus belongs to the Galliformes order in
the class Aves (Birds). Sightings of capercaillie made by me during hiking, working and hunting both big and small game the last 4 years:
Most of the sightings are from the late summer and autumn.
Sightings of grown females without young are not marked. The blue circle is my house. Several “hotspots” of sightings and two large clear-cut fields are marked on the map:
It should be noted the spruce is not a native species in the local area of Hemne. There is a mountain pass that the spruce can’t cross. Pine is the natural conifer. The spruce fields are planted to dense for at least for the males. Also the spruces don’t have much of feeding value during the winter. What kind of factors influences the numbers in the local wood grouse population in at the Dalum property, Hemne, Norway?
Hunting: One of the more traditional ways of game management is predator control and indeed during the worst of the scabies epidemic on red fox there was an increase in some game species. Still this method is regarded as largely ineffective. They are also in my eyes ethical reasons for not letting predator control go out of hand. Eradicating native species because of their capability of competing with human hunters are not compatible with moderns hunting. Some of the predator species have what seems to be unnaturally large population in our area. Crows, fox, maybe badger are species where culling might help more wood grouse chicks survive the first months. Mink is non-native species and should be removed or kept down to a minimum still it’s not present in large numbers in the given area. Birds of prey don’t have large enough population in the area to damage the population. Sightings are rare. Marten is one of the predators having many of the same requirements as
the wood grouse for habitat. (Older pine forest) Also wood grouse are
a part of their natural diet. The marten has had made a comeback in resent
year after a disturbing slump in the population. It now looks like the
marten has a health population in the area. A few cases of successful
trapping and sightings are hopefully signs that we will be able to enjoy
the company of this animal also in the future.
Habitat destruction: Of this the clear cuts and the plantation of new dense spruce fields seem to be the factor with the most influence in the given area. Foreign trees like the Russian Sitka spruce where tried in small scale locally, but never caught on. It might be because of the largely conservative mindset of the local landowners. The area has been used for timber and firewood production for several hundred years. The difference now is that way the cut. Clear cutting of larger areas, instead of picking out single trees spread over a larger area might have a negative effect. Keeping the areas small and leaving some large trees in the clearings are measurements to reduce the damage. Several other game species and probably also young and females will benefit from smaller clearings in the forest actually increasing populations. The clear cuttings usually involve construction of timber roads and drainage of wet areas. Still the area is quite wet with lots of marshes that hopefully give the young chicks good conditions. And timber road constructions are usually very restrictive and used mostly in winter when heavy machines do the least damage. The area is generally too wet and steep for the heaviest machines. Timber roads might be positive in some ways for the grown individuals. They need stones of certain size and shape for their gizzard. The open roads provide the animals the choice of stones without having to travel far. In winter wood grouse is often seen early in the morning on roads, picking stones. No LEK site has been found in the area or in the immediate surrounding, this is problem. Cutting in LEK site should be extremely restricted. There have been heated discussions on the importance of preservation these sites. Timber interests generally take the view that the location of these sites has little importance, and that the capercaillie always will find a place to mate. On the other side the hunters and conservation forces, views these sites as very important and says cutting here will do great damage. I believe that it’s better to protect the sites as long as we don’t know for sure what effects cutting will have. Also a LEK site might be in use for hundreds of years giving spectacular sights for the nature interested. With a large number of male collecting on one place to give their great display of force and beauty, they are a spectacular sight. Finding the LEK site and agreeing on its protection is high up on the list of conservation actions that should be taken. As a conclusion of this essay I would say that the wood grouse is a species that are capable of handling most effects of predation and hunting, but the destruction of the old pine forest might do this species great harm. The time will tell, in the meantime it looks like the local forest owners and also the authorities leans towards a line of less disturbance of the nature. In this area the growth of the forests are larger than the cutting. But the males need old pine forests and it needs to be protected and handled with care if the capercaillie population is not to decrease. No real scientific work has been done in the area I’m righting about. Sightings of birds and other observations might have different reasons than my conclusions and assumptions.
Jegerproveboka by Stein Lier-Hansen and Bjorn Wegge Landbruksforlaget ISBN 82-529-1818-2 The Armature Naturalist (Naturboka, Norwegian edition) Article series in Jakt og Fiske. (Hunting and fishing magazine by the
Norwegian hunter and fisher association.)
|
|||||||||||
| Notes (if any)
by Peter Kabai: |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||