|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nature 404, 441 - 442 (2000) Å Macmillan Publishers
Ltd.
Survival of the clearest
STEVEN PINKER
Steven Pinker is in the Department of Brain and Cognitive
Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
02193, USA. e-mail: steve@psyche.mit.edu
There are no fossils to show how language evolved.
But evolutionary game theory is revealing how some of the defining
features of human language could have been shaped by natural selection.
The study of the evolution of language, famously banned
by the Société de Linguistique de Paris in 1866 and dismissed as idle
story-telling ever since, has returned to respectability. Recent years
have seen a flurry of articles and books1-5, a biannual research conference
and now several papers by Martin Nowak and collaborators applying
evolutionary game theory to the problem6-9. Their latest offering
appears on page 495 of this issue9.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| webmester | Kabai | ISO-8859-2 |
||