|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Animal Behaviour Vol. 59, No. 2, February 2000 pp. 349-359 The transvestite serpent: why do male garter snakes
court (some) other males? R. Shine*, 1, P. Harlow*, M. P. LeMaster,
2, I. T. Moore, 2, R. T. Mason, 2
*School of Biological Sciences A08, University of Sydney
Department of Zoology, Oregon State University
In large mating aggregations of red-sided garter snakes,
Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis, in Manitoba, male courtship is directed
not only to females, but also to other males with female-like skin lipids
(`she-males'). We show that `she-maleness' is an intrinsic property
of a male rather than an artefact of lipid transfer from females, and
that male-male courtship is very common in the field. She-males were
distinctive in terms of appearance (they were heavier than other males
and more often covered with mud), behaviour (they were inactive and
rarely courted females) and performance (they were slow crawlers, ineffective
courters and easily outcompeted by other males in mating trials). `She-maleness'
was not a characteristic of a particular subset of males, as envisaged
in previous work; instead, it was a transitory phase that most (perhaps
all) male snakes passed through soon after they first emerged from the
winter den. Recently emerged males spent their first day or two relatively
inactive, while restoring physiological functions (including locomotor
performance and courtship ability). Experimental application of female
skin lipids on to males dramatically decreased courtship levels of the
recipient snakes. Thus, recently emerged males may derive two kinds
of benefit from mimicking female skin lipids. First, female mimicry
`switches off' the male's own (energetically expensive) courtship at
a time when that courtship would be unproductive. Second, it may disadvantage
his rivals by distracting them from females, and increasing their energy
expenditure.
1Correspondence: R. Shine, School of Biological Sciences
A08, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia (email:rics@bio.usyd.edu.au).
2M. P. LeMaster, I. T. Moore and R. T. Mason are at
the Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Cordley Hall 3029,
Corvallis, Oregon 97331-2914, U.S.A. http://www.idealibrary.com/links/doi/10.1006/anbe.1999.1321/production
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| webmester | Kabai | ISO-8859-2 |
||